Same rules apply, but I may be looking into the deduction of worst two weeks.

You may remember me stating the above at the start of this seasons predictor, and have noticed that no reductions have been made.

It has however, come to my attention, that those towards the top are running away with it. Also, more than ever before have dropped out.

The rule was obviously created, to keep the lower scorers in with a chance of catching up. Below are two tables, as it is now and how it would be if the deductions take place.  

I feel that for the good of the game, I have no alternative but to implement the deductions.

Any objections?  

     

			Wk1	Wk2	Deductions	Wk3	Wk4	Wk5	Wk6	Wk7	Wk8	Wk9		TOTAL
Pos.	Name		04-Apr	11-Apr
1	Tony P	655	16	35	0	0	0	0	0	0	0			706
2	Alfie	649	20	27	0	0	0	0	0	0	0			696
3	Motty	634	25	27	0	0	0	0	0	0	0			686
4	Stevenage	633	21	25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0			679
5	Johnny K	617	24	25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0			666
6	Jiggs	623	13	29	0	0	0	0	0	0	0			665
7	Purpleblade	589	14	28	0	0	0	0	0	0	0			631
8	Charlie Ham	587	18	25	0	0	0	0	0	0	0			630
9	NamHammer	532	35	15	0	0	0	0	0	0	0			582
10	Kray Jnr.	535	16	29	0	0	0	0	0	0	0			580
10	Blakey	540	21	19	0	0	0	0	0	0	0			580
12	Abbi	529	19	27	0	0	0	0	0	0	0			575
13	Iron Dane	535	12	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0			547
14	Sandy's	469	0	24	0	0	0	0	0	0	0			493
15	Sir Ian	482	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0			482
16	Eastham 75	446	19	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0			465

With deductions


     

Pos.	Name		04-Apr	11-Apr	Deductions									TOTAL
1	Tony P	655	16	35	-87	0	0	0	0	0	0			619
2	Motty	634	25	27	-73	0	0	0	0	0	0			613
3	Alfie	649	20	27	-91	0	0	0	0	0	0			605
4	Jiggs	623	13	29	-66	0	0	0	0	0	0			599
5	Stevenage	633	21	25	-82	0	0	0	0	0	0			597
6	Johnny K	617	24	25	-73	0	0	0	0	0	0			593
7	Purpleblade	589	14	28	-69	0	0	0	0	0	0			562
8	Charlie Ham	587	18	25	-73	0	0	0	0	0	0			557
9	Kray Jnr.	535	16	29	-41	0	0	0	0	0	0			539
10	NamHammer	532	35	15	-62	0	0	0	0	0	0			520
11	Blakey	540	21	19	-66	0	0	0	0	0	0			514
12	Iron Dane	535	12	0	-36	0	0	0	0	0	0			511
13	Abbi	529	19	27	-72	0	0	0	0	0	0			503
14	Sandy's Sox	469	0	24	-54	0	0	0	0	0	0			439
15	Sir Ian	482	0	0	-50	0	0	0	0	0	0			432
16	Eastham 75	446	19	0	-47	0	0	0	0	0	0			418

Your shout Jiggles. You're the boss !

It depends when you're gonna do it, Jiggs; as I couldn't post on Saturday, I'd be DELIGHTED to lose this week, but if you do it as shown, I drop a place AND get the crap week still to come.  Sorry, am I being a tad selfish?

Don't mind.

Your call Jiggs.

Stevenage Dave wrote:It depends when you're gonna do it, Jiggs; as I couldn't post on Saturday, I'd be DELIGHTED to lose this week, but if you do it as shown, I drop a place AND get the crap week still to come.  Sorry, am I being a tad selfish?

I'll be doing it straight away Dave.  The deductions are for the last three quarters, so this weeks will be deducted from the final quarter.

It moves me up two places, which is really why I posed the question.  

As I've said, it puts the lower scorers in with a chance of catching up.  You have to look at the bigger picture darlin', you are now 5 whole points closer to the top     

You are the boss!

But Jiggs, I'm a football fan, so don't expect me to be reasonable! I only care about my own team and I'll tread on anyone's necks to make them successful.  Burning-up with hatred, I am.  But like they say, it's your call...
 

I predict a riot.

Stevenage Dave wrote:But Jiggs, I'm a football fan, so don't expect me to be reasonable! I only care about my own team and I'll tread on anyone's necks to make them successful.  Burning-up with hatred, I am.  But like they say, it's your call...
 

I know how competitive you are Dave, you've just leapfrogged me to the top of the Fantasy League  

Well, the experiment failed, the deductions are in place ............. Mwwwwwahahahaha!  

JulianDicksLeftKnee wrote:I predict a riot.

I'll be dropping from 2nd to 3rd